John UM
I often see in some articles that someone has blown “This animation quality has exploded!”, or if the style is not good, it will disregard the “draw”, but many people can’t really understand the meaning of these words. In the animation, what is the difference between the meaning of the words, the style of painting, the painting, and the quality of the words? The author takes this science
What is the style of animation?
The style of painting is the style of painting. Different painters, even if they draw the same character, can have different styles and the results are quite different. The bad style of painting does not mean that painting can’t be done. Just like the animated “Ping Pong”, it is to restore the wild and scribble style of comics. Instead of twisting the twisted lines, most people may not like this style, but “Ping Pong” The performance is quite high-level, and it is also very expressive, so the taste of style can not be said to be the pros and cons of painting
Animated painting is good or bad.
The paintings are good and bad, and they must be connected with the style of painting. I just mentioned that the painting style is not good for painting. Even if the painting style is broken, the painting itself is not necessarily bad. In general, the animations that are drawn should not be statically close, and the character’s expressiveness should be full; the action painting should be as full as possible and the movements should be smooth and natural, without obvious sense of violation; for example, “Naruto Ninja” The common play in “” is generally quite intentional. In the coherent painting, there are some dynamic collapses. This is within the allowable range of painting. Because of the coherent animation, these collapses as long as you don’t stop the screenshot, basically it is not It affects the viewing, so the tolerance of the action painting is still relatively high, but to show the wonderful and shocking of the play, you need the skill of the painter. This is not a simple “good painting” can be summarized. There are considerable challenges to the original artist’s abilities
The quality of the animation is good or bad.
The word “quality” is also the word that many people abuse the most. In fact, the quality of the picture is related to the factors such as resolution, brightness, color, sharpness, etc. It is an objective factor. Of course, the quality of the image is subjective. Some people see that the picture has collapsed more, and they say that “the quality of the picture is retrogressive.” In fact, the quality of the new program in 2019 is undoubtedly the quality of the new program that was smashed more than 10 years ago. Except for the works of the era.) In many cases, the resolution of the production determines the upper limit of the image quality of the animation. In 2019, the Japanese TV animation can still produce a few 1080p works (the visual inspection does not exceed 10% of the total)
The quality of Japanese animation is very special. Because of the resolution of native production, the quality loss is more powerful than other film and television works.
Digital age, the resolution used in Japanese animation is uncertain, for example, some new programs are 720p, some are 800p, some are 955p, but the signal to the TV station must be output via the 1080i specification. In the middle, it is necessary to stretch the original resolution, so that the image quality loss, even if the animation of the blue light, also need to be stretched to get 1080p resolution, this process, unless the original will be 1080p production, Otherwise the quality of the picture is inevitable because of the loss of stretching. The higher the native resolution, the higher the final quality of the animation
The animation screen is good or bad.
The “picture” is a very general vocabulary. The picture can include picture quality and style, and the overall perception. The effect of the later stage of photography will also greatly affect the effect of the picture. But remember, good picture quality does not mean that the picture is good, and good picture does not mean good picture quality, for example
Just like “Fate ZERO”, this work is made by UFO, and the most powerful place of UFO is photography (that is, late), the later effects are quite gorgeous, plus excellent painting, overall, light and shadow effects and The character performance can be said to be “the picture is very gorgeous”, but this does not mean that “the picture quality is good” (of course, FZ is a kind of good quality), and the resolution of the video itself depends on factors such as the resolution of the video itself. Just like the genuine “Fate zero” of station B, the highest resolution is only 720p, and the source of the film is probably the source of the DVD, which is 480i, so the “Fate ZERO” of the B station and the “Fate ZERO” of the original Blu-ray are compared. It can be said that the slag quality is good. But it does not affect you to say that it is gorgeous
The reverse is also the same, the picture quality is good, the picture is good
Like last quarter, “I like what you are in the novel”
Commonly known as “Changmei”, many people say that “the quality of the painting is poor”. In fact, the “Changmei” line is sharp, the resolution is higher than the average new program, and the color is also very bright. The quality of this work is not Poor, but the painting collapsed, the late effect is general, so the final look “picture is very poor.” The quality and quality of the picture are completely two concepts
Then you have to ask, are there any examples of works of good quality, style, painting, and pictures? Yes, the “Violet Eternal Garden” in January last year is such an example. Not only is the production of native 1080p, but also the painting of Jingani is very fine, like a piece of art, it is finely crafted, and the later effect is rich. Finally, The style, quality and picture can be described as very good. Usually in a well-made animation, these words do appear together, but the meaning of each word is different