John UM
These days, there is a case on the Japanese network, which is very hot: Some people say that the “Theatrical City Hunter” released this year has been slammed by critics, saying that it is “the same as before, no evolution” “is a city.” Hunter, but it doesn’t matter, that’s it.” “The fans are always from beginning to end, without the color of the creator.”
This tweet is not the original source of rumors, but it has become a well-known opportunity for rumors
(https://twitter.com/Yankun1984/status/1102493333258043392).
Such criticism has naturally provoked many fans who love the new theatrical version. They swarmed up and blamed the critics for their fierce accusations. Many of them even pointed the muzzle to all the critics and the entire Japanese film industry. They thought that they only knew the empty talk and the people, so Japan took Not a good movie
However, what’s weird is that although a tweet that quoted these criticisms has been forwarded nearly 10,000 times, there are many porting sites and Twitter accounts that mention these criticisms, but no one knows which one is. Critics, in what media, published the above views, whether the original text has been taken out of context
The film critic Kasuga Taiichi said that if people are only mad at the “fictional criticism” of “fictional critics,” it is too convincing. Before you express your opinions and feelings, you will only be led by the nose without first confirming the source
Kasuga also saw that some people are not only unilaterally swearing at the “criticism that cannot confirm the existence of the critics”, but even because “the critics must think so” Kinds of delusions are greatly criticized
Kasuga believes that carrying websites is a “tool to incite the crowds and stimulate their aggressiveness.” Those who credulously believe in such websites are the targets of jealousy
(https://twitter.com/tkasuga1977/status/1102757229826957317).
Occupy the high point of IQ is certainly refreshing, but behind the incident, the reality reflected is intriguing: in this era when everyone can comment, the name “criticist” has not only lost its authority, It will even be resentful
Writer Maeda has long ridiculed himself: he clearly claims to be a “contributor”, but when he goes to the media, his title will always become a “criticist.” People told him: “If you use the title of the contributor, it will be convincing to the audience/readers if you say it.” The understatement reveals a contempt for his profession
But recently, compared to propaganda words like “criticists are full of praise!”, perhaps “criticists are bad reviews, but the general audience praises!” will be more interesting. This is the case with Bohemian Rhapsody
It’s better to say that the critics’ image on the Internet may be basically a sandbag for anyone to hang. Maeda complained: Bullying is too ugly! Be good to people!
(https://twitter.com/maeQ)
The comic critic Ito Gang said that after he claimed to be a “manga critics”, the work entrusted to him was reduced. There is also a magazine editor who said to him in person: “I don’t want to ask a critic, but I want people who want to be closer to the fans…”.
Ito suspects that Japan’s initiative to be a comic critics may only be one of him. Even the most authoritative manuscript of the comic critics, Natsume Sakurai, claims to be a “manga columnist.”
(https://twitter.com/GoITO/status/1102930023453884416).
And the film critic Spring Day too mentioned in the previous article, after continuing to pay attention to this incident, finally came to the conclusion:
- The audience was not good at the critic’s career
- The audience was already dissatisfied with the status quo of the Japanese film industry
- Now there is such an opportunity to not only belittle critics but also criticize the film industry
- Critics are nothing but a target of criticism. Whether it is real or not is not important at all
Kasuga also added that the “criticists” in the hearts of the people who attacked this group seem to be “arrogant and authoritative people who are self-righteous, who do not practice, only know that art is better than caring for the audience.” But he hopes that everyone understands that in today’s “film critic”, there is no such person. Even if there is such a thing, such people will not go to see “City Hunter”
(https://twitter.com/tkasuga1977/status/1103249188890923008).
Editing Ping Yan Zhen Fu often works with critics in his work. In his view, many people on the Internet who hate critics seem to have only an annoying role in the fictional works, and the work of people who actually engage in commentary activities. Nothing to know, just relying on his own impressions
Although the actual comments at home are also seen by people who are self-speaking and far-fetched, Pingyan also hopes that everyone knows that there are also critics who are sincere about the subject of comments. This will also help you broaden and deepen your world
Ping Yan also said that in the fictional image, the very famous critic is “Going to the Dead”! “Jian Ruijie, who appeared in the episode.” Many people have only seen a group of dad and magical conversations that are often quoted in this episode, and they feel that he is a hateful critic. But Pingyan hopes that everyone can read the complete episode and will completely reverse his impression
(https://twitter.com/hiraiwa/status/1103568186832650241).
And the writer Shenye Longyi saw this farce and started the imagination: Oshii Guardians supervised version of “Theatrical City Hunter”, telling that “City Hunter” was criticized by critics and angered the fans, but the riots were out of control, however In fact, the story that the critics did not exist
(https://twitter.com/shen1oong/status/1102848054594420736)